Online estate agency HouseSimple has changed the wording of one of its adverts after the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received a complaint that it was misleading.
The advert, which appeared on a tram, suggested that clients of HouseSimple could “Save £15,665 versus average Foxtons fee of 2.4”.
The complainant queried whether the ad could be deemed misleading because it did not make clear the basis of the savings claim.
The ASA says that after it approached HouseSimple with the complaint, the agency agreed to amend the ad.
HouseSimple amended the advert to make it clear that the savings claim is based on selling a property at the agency's own current average asking price in London.
In light of this amendment, the ASA considered the matter to have been 'informally resolved' and closed the case.
"The complaint related to a particular figure we had referenced in the advert. We accepted that it might have been confusing and were happy to make the necessary amend to ensure the message we were trying to get across was as clear as possible," Alex Gosling, ceo of HouseSimple told Estate Agent Today.
He says that the firm came to the savings figure of £15,664 by taking its average price for a London property (£561,373) and using Foxtons' average vendor fee of 2.4% +VAT (which was taken from independent research by Peel Hunt) to calculate a vendor fee of £16,167.
It then subtracted its own average vendor fee for a London property (£502) to arrive at the conclusion that the average HouseSimple vendor in London would save over £15,000 by using the online agency over Foxtons.
HouseSimple says that if it had used Foxtons' or Rightmove's average London property price in its advert, it would have quoted respective savings figures of £25,001 and £17,213.
Gosling says that this incident won't change the way his firm structures its advertising campaigns in the future.
“We feel the message we are trying to convey to consumers, on the savings they can make using an online estate agent, is an important one to get across. We just need to ensure the message is clear so there's no room for confusion," he says.
He also confirms that HouseSimple will continue to use the Foxtons comparison in its ads.
"We feel we are within our rights to make that comparison. The figures are taken from a credible source."
A dispute over claims made on online estate agency HouseSimple's website...
Complaints made against adverts issued by property firms have increased by...
Online agency HouseSimple has once again been the subject of a...
Online agency HouseSimple has been told that by the Advertising Standards...
It’s tempting to think that Michael Gove’s proposed clampdown on Airbnb-style...
Councils across England could make an additional £540m a year in...
The vast majority of negligence claims against conveyancers are for relatively...
You don’t have to simply accept things as they are when...
From the uptick in house sales in January to a house price...
Happy birthday to us….and all members of the The ValPal Network! We...
With a combined value surpassing £7.4 trillion, the UK’s 29 million...
Let's be honest – landlords are the lifeblood of any letting...
%20-%20IMAGE%20Client%20Accounting%20%E2%80%93%20what%20are%20your%20options.jpg)
The benefits for letting agents to outsource their client accounting is...
When almost all agents and developers use the tried and tested formula...
I think we can all agree that the National Trading Standards...
.png)
As domestic battery storage systems become increasingly prevalent in UK homes,...
.png)
A team from The ValPal Network joined industry Facebook ads expert...
.png)
In this interview, Riccardo Dawson, Chief Operating Officer at Alto and...
A client account is essential to your lettings business, but the...
%20(002).png)
In today's fast-paced and ever-evolving property industry, it’s essential that forward-thinking...
As electric vehicles increasingly populate our roads and the necessity for...
As estate agents, it is important to make sure that your...
Estate agency has changed. No longer is it required to sit in...
Changes to consumer behaviour usually arrive in waves. Most of the...
At iamproperty we are excited to share the announcement of our...
In an exclusive interview with Estate Agent Today, Simon Coaker, Sales &...
It’s no secret – 2023 is a difficult year for the...
2023 has been coined as ‘the year of AI adoption’, and...
%20(002).jpg)
There are a few common questions that arise when the issue...
As a signage company we know we have a serious responsibility...
The Government’s mini budget on September 23 was anything but ‘mini’...
Agent websites have become more crucial than ever in attracting new...
Interesting report this week in Estate Agent Today on an analysis...
An anti-money laundering (AML) expert has queried why there is a...
MPs have launched an inquiry on improving the home buying and...
MPs have launched an inquiry on improving the home buying and...
The Law Society is facing backlash from conveyancers after issuing new...
An anti-money laundering (AML) expert has queried why there is a...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Who are you, and what does it say on...
Who are you and what does it say on your...
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
What if a sale hits problems from offer to completion? The £500 fee doesn't inspire that sufficient time will be devoted to resolving matters. The online business model remains flawed and only for those that like to gamble
It's not surprising that they changed the wording voluntarily. They must have known any case against them would have been upheld and by doing it 'voluntarily' softens the negative publicity blow.
@Chris Arnold - I think you're being a little harsh on online agents. In what way is it flawed compared to, say, agency websites that look like they've been lifted from the early days of the internet (plenty of traditional agents have this issue) or a resistance to anything resembling change or better value for money for the customers?
Not saying online agents are perfect, far from it. But I think there is plenty to criticise traditional agents for as well. I don't understand why online and traditional can't just co-exist together. If online agents are no threat, why do the trads get so defensive about them?
Please login to comment