x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Major concerns about the Funding for Lending scheme have surfaced amid new data showing that mortgage approvals are lagging well behind those of last year.

Clare Francis, of MoneySupermarket, said there was no sign yet of Funding for Lending helping the ‘beleaguered mortgage market’, while the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries said the scheme threatened to distort the market because it wasn’t being made available to smaller lenders.

The British Bankers Association reported that a monthly increase in the number of mortgage approvals was more than expected in July, but the figure was still 17% below that of July last year.
 
Altogether, says the BBA, there were 28,441 house purchase loan approvals, up from 25,940 in June. The figure was above the consensus forecast of 27,250, but down from 34,125 in July 2011.

Remortgage approvals stood at 15,600, up from 14,033 on a monthly basis, but down from the 26,272 of a year ago.

The latest BBA data showed that gross mortgage lending of £7.1bn in July was below the recent monthly average, reflecting continued low levels of activity in the housing market.

Peter Williams, executive director of the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association, said: “It is no surprise that these figures are not stronger.

“The combination of increased capital requirements and conduct of business controls impacting on lenders generally will mean that mortgages will continue to be in short supply. As such, the industry will not be able to satisfy the housing aspirations of all, and a material level of growth going forward will continue to be a challenge.
 
“This is not a complaint – it’s just a fact of life in an environment where the demand for safer banks and safe lending to consumers is prioritised to the degree that it is.
 
“The new Funding for Lending scheme may have an impact on gross lending, but the benefit is most likely to be directed at lower-risk lending which therefore has the potential to distort markets further.

“IMLA has serious reservations about the manner in which Funding for Lending is not being made available to smaller banks and building societies and specialist lenders.

“Aside from being anti-competitive, it means that these facilities are not available to those businesses that have a strong track record of innovation. Many of these have also been well managed through the financial crisis and have not required a subsidy from public funds to keep them afloat.”

Clare Francis, of MoneySupermarket, said: “Our analysis shows the continuing difficulty facing first-time buyers and those with smaller deposits looking to find a suitable mortgage.

“Despite the launch of the Funding for Lending Scheme which was designed to encourage further mortgage lending by the banks, there appears to be few signs that the initiative is helping those with small deposits.

“It is still early days and we won’t see any data on the impact of the initiative until the end of the year, but so far there is little to indicate that the scheme will kick start the beleaguered mortgage market.”

Nick Hopkinson, director of property firm PPR Estates, said he was concerned about borrowing rates drifting up.

He said: “Bank lending for mortgages remains effectively closed to everyone who really needs it. Huge deposits and perfect credit histories remain essential ingredients for anyone brave enough to be buying a house with a mortgage at the moment.

“Also, the announcement that one of the biggest high-street lenders [Santander] is increasing its mortgage costs to existing borrowers will be a further blow to many struggling home owners.

“This is an ominous sign, indicating that real borrowing costs have disconnected from the Bank of England base rate and are moving towards 5%-plus in the near future for most mortgages.”

Comments

  • icon

    Help us lobby the Government to grow SMEs & take this short survey, just 7 Questions > http://svy.mk/OHXffl

    • 27 August 2012 13:57 PM
  • icon

    We have a Repo for a lender and it comes with a ........................95% mortgage!

    • 24 August 2012 13:55 PM
  • icon

    Don't you need 20-40% deposits/equity for these deals?

    I can understand why lenders don't want 5-10% deposits when prices continue to fall. It would just increase their bad loan book.

    • 24 August 2012 10:39 AM
  • icon

    Funding for Lending not yet working? Rates on new savings accounts, which had been rising for many months, all fell back within days of this scheme coming on line. It is having the desired effect - getting prudent savers and pensioners to subsidise mortgage payers.

    • 24 August 2012 09:31 AM
  • icon

    Small businesses frozen out? It's the same with the NewBuy scheme: the costs are prohibitive for small-to-medium-sized developers and builders, as are the capital requirements. A small builder will typically make his or her profits in the last 10% of the sale value, so to be forced to lock at least 5% of the value in the house if one is selling to a NewBuy buyer just makes the scheme a non-starter. It means 10-15% of one's working capital is trapped in a dead, non-performing asset and it will have a significant impact on one's profitability, which makes it even harder to access development lending. A large builder, in contrast, has a lot of capital and properties for sale and can afford to leave some capital embedded in the site if it means all the properties are sold sooner.

    • 24 August 2012 08:30 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal