x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Asking prices for property new to the market have dropped by 1.7% over the last month – an average of £4,091 – as over-supply coincides with holidaying buyers.

Rightmove said this morning that the price fall affects 117,000 new properties added to its site so far this month – a surprisingly high total and the highest figure Rightmove has recorded for August since 2007, just as the market peaked.

The drop follows a 0.6% fall in asking prices last month. Until July, Rightmove had seen only rises in asking prices. The average asking price is now £232,241 – still astonishingly high compared with ‘actual’ data from Halifax, Nationwide and the Land Registry, which are currently quoting under £170,000. Asking prices peaked in June at £237,767.

Miles Shipside, commercial director of Rightmove, said: “No one really wants to come to market in August unless they have to.

“It shows these new sellers have a compelling need to sell, as they have lopped over £4,000 off the average asking price.

“Those who marketed earlier in the year but have yet to find a buyer may have to do a bit of pruning of their own to beat this new competition.”

He said that current market conditions resemble those of the second half of 2008: “Then, prices fell by 7.1% between August and the end of the year, as buyers unwilling or unable to proceed left agents with unsold stock levels similar to those currently being recorded by Rightmove.”

He said the average agent’s office now has 79 properties on its books, with new stock coming on to Rightmove’s books at an average of 29,220 per week.

The figure compares with mortgage approvals of less than half that number – currently an average of 13,852 a week.

“The imbalance between mortgage and stock availability remains painfully clear,” said Shipside.

He added that pent-up buyer demand is illustrated by record daily activity on the site, with 25.4 million pages viewed on August 10.

Comments

  • icon

    PropertyWatcher - can you plaster?

    Have to warn you, the second we kick off, Barratt, Persimmon, et al will take out a contract on us both... ;0)

    I'm also a little worried about how we are going to finance all this. And, how the buyers are going to finance their purchases, seeing as all the banks are simply interlending.

    • 18 August 2010 15:13 PM
  • icon

    PeeBee, I don't think they should be built for peanuts, just not for (much?) profit and financed by the government (by seizing appropriate land.) I know its a flight of fancy!

    If we can build starter homes for £60k (even £100k) then I think that's well within the realms of affordability for the majority.

    Let's do it PeeBee, me and you.

    • 17 August 2010 20:59 PM
  • icon

    PropertyWatcher: Your visions for vast new development would be welcomed by builders and buyers alike - but there is only one flaw in the idea. New houses simply cannot be built for peanuts. Wimpey recently announced that by judicious pruning they had reduced build cost to just over £100 per square foot. That's £60k plus just to BUILD a starter home - no land cost; no overheads; and no profit. New legislation (Code for Sustainable Homes) currently adds approximately £5000 to the build cost of every new home. By 2016, this figure is set to rise to over £40,000. EXTRA.

    It's no good talking about subsidies and incentives - so many other countries owe us money, and we owe so many others, that GB Ltd is on the verge of bankruptcy as it is!

    • 17 August 2010 17:51 PM
  • icon

    PeeBee is generally correct. I think prices will fall a bit in most areas, apart from the most desirable, but with mortgage availability and negative equity problems, the market will stay quite static with low sales volumes. The market will only really be open to the equity rich and opportunists.

    We need a government that will embark on large scale building programmes across the country (new towns?) to include houses priced to match average salaries and lots of rentals run by not-for-profit organisations, with capped rents and long term tenancies. But we don't have that sort of government.

    Perhaps if those who make their living from the property industry were to lobby for this sort of solution, instead of for ever increasing prices, we may get somewhere. Otherwise stagnation it is.

    • 17 August 2010 12:08 PM
  • icon

    MartynB:

    You just made a point - "The wealthy will buy up at bargain levels for BTL purposes." IF these properties are being offered at 'bargain levels', as you suggest, then why cannot first-timers afford them?. Furthermore, IF prices are to reduce further, surely BTLetters will snap these up even quicker, leaving FTBs still high and dry?

    Low prices will not cure all, as you and many others seem to think. For a start, it will prevent several million homes being re-offered for sale, due to negative equity. That's several million homes; several million sellers who would then go on to be buyers of several million more homes - need I say more...

    We have entered a new phase of the housing market. Vastly reduced numbers of transactions will be the norm, I believe. I dread to think how those who live by 'the Numbers Game' expect to survive in the coming years...

    • 17 August 2010 10:17 AM
  • icon

    Prices are still too high for real movement in the market; new buyers will stimulate activity only when they can afford to participate. For now the deals will be rental led. The wealthy will buy up at bargain levels for BTL purposes.

    • 16 August 2010 19:56 PM
  • icon

    prices need to come down further, yes there is far too much over inflated stock for sale and in my experience independents are just as guilty as the big chains. This august is significantly quieter than august 2009 and i believe the industry is in for a lean winter.

    • 16 August 2010 13:45 PM
  • icon

    What movement will there be in the 'market' if most of the existing owners fall into negative equity because prices fall too much?

    RM is an excellent marketing tool and they obviously have an excellent commercial director who constantly gets RM's views across to the mass media , but it does make one think where are the constant views of the actual agents themselves - in the shape of the RICS and NFoPP?

    Just a thought!

    • 16 August 2010 11:35 AM
  • icon

    The sooner prices fall to a level that first time buyers can afford on a 3x multiplier the better. There will then be far more activity - us estate agents will earn less commission per sale, but probably the same overall if there are more properties being shifted.

    • 16 August 2010 10:56 AM
  • icon

    Shame on every EA thats lists overpriced stock- "list to sell" not "list to list" and hope- better job required you overpricing cheap fee lot, wake up the industry has changed, did you notice Northern Rock 3 years ago?

    • 16 August 2010 10:15 AM
  • icon

    The big UK news story of the final quarter will be the lack of mortgage funding. Not just FTBs or high LTV - everyone. The Gov will have to step in. The housing market is central to the economy & consumer confidence & the banks are just self serving.

    • 16 August 2010 10:00 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal