Labour and the Lib Dems would likely have done much the same of course, but that would at least have been following their traditional philosophy - the political shock is that the measures of the past decade have come from the ‘pro-landlord’ party.
The extension of the eviction ban announced by government a week ago, apparently with little or no consultation with the private rental industry, caught trade bodies on the hop and is an example of something that probably wouldn’t have happened from a government of this political persuasion - at least in this manner - a generation ago.
So why the change?
Firstly, of course, the rental sector is so much larger now and that means for all parties and policy makers it’s harder to ignore.
Data released 18 months ago by the Office for National Statistics show that the number of households privately renting in the UK rose from 2.8m in 2007 to 4.5m in 2017 - that’s a rise of 63 per cent in one decade, and the figures are presumably higher still now in 2020.
While there are proportionately more families and older tenants than before, it’s still the case that younger households are more likely to rent privately: in 2017 some 47 per cent of private tenants were aged 16 to 34.
Secondly, younger voters are traditionally Labour and older voters traditionally Conservative; with elections usually closely fought, both major parties woo the young vote.
YouGov research of 11,590 adults in October last year showed the case in point:
• amongst 18-24 year olds, 38 per cent said they would vote Labour (16 per cent Tory);
• amongst 25-29 year olds, 38 per cent Labour and 18 per cent Conservative;
• amongst 30 to 39 year olds, it was 33 per cent Labour and 23 per cent Tory.
Not until 40-plus did the Conservatives outweigh Labour, and for the oldest sector of 70-years-plus, it was overwhelming: 58 per cent Conservative and only nine per cent Labour.
So for the Conservatives to win swing seats - the ones they did in fact win in December last year to secure their large majority - they need to attract some of those younger voters, and presumably pro-tenant policies are seen as a weapon to do so.
Thirdly, a much higher proportion of older people vote than younger people. Therefore parties believe they need increasingly strident policies skewed to young voters.
You’ll recall in the December 2019 General Election there was almost a bidding war between Labour and the Conservatives over how much they would reduce or scrap tuition fees, and over how quickly they would scrap Section 21 eviction powers, and other ‘pro-young’ policies - this was an example of parties becoming ever-more keen to win younger votes which may have swayed the result in constituencies.
Research on this area is limited but after the 2015 General Election, polling organisation Ipsos Mori discovered that just 43 per cent of 18 to 24 year olds voted, compared with 78 per cent of people aged 65 or over.
There may be good reasons for the difference - younger people are more likely to be working, or at college, or not be registered to vote because they are mobile and living or studying away from home.
But whatever the reason, they are a less ‘reliable’ voting group because they do not necessarily come out to vote: therefore they have to be tempted by policies like the increasingly pro-tenant ones now espoused by Tories as well as Labour.
The UK’s first-past-the-post and constituency-based voting system accentuates the issues outlined above.
So will things ever change?
Hamptons International this year calculated there were now just 2.66m landlords in the UK - when compared with 4.5m private rental households, many with two voters in each household, the maths makes it easy to see why both major political parties have now turned on buy-to-let as they scramble for votes.
Sadly, we can’t expect that to change any time soon.
*Editor of Estate Agent Today and Letting Agent Today, Graham can be found tweeting about all things property at @PropertyJourn