x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Just when you thought the General Election couldn’t get any duller, along comes a lively little spat to take our minds off all those family-friendly policies, saving the NHS, supporting our schools, the green agenda and … whoops, nearly nodded off there.

So hurrah to Zoopla for wading in to say that the Lib Dems have got their sums hopelessly wrong on the mansion tax.

How come? Well, the Lib Dems have calculated that the tax of 1% on houses worth over £2m would net them £1.7bn.

But Zoopla has done what it calls its own detailed analysis – the site lists every property in the UK, not just those that are on the market, which may come as a surprise to some –  and reckons it will raise £1.2bn.

Indeed, Zoopla is remarkably specific: the proposed mansion tax would affect just 38,500 home-owners – or 0.15% of the total.

Almost all – 90% – would be in London and the south-east, while an incredible 24% of the total national take from mansion tax would come from just one borough, Kensington & Chelsea, where 8,000 residents would be hit.

According to Zoopla, those having to pay the mansion tax would contribute an extra £32,270 a year to the Exchequer, with those at the threshold paying £20,000.

Now, EAT’s not much good at sums, but even we can work out that 1% of £2m is £20,000.

Unfortunately, that’s not what the Lib Dem manifesto says: the mansion tax will be paid on the value of the property ABOVE the £2m level.

“Zoopla’s figures are a completely nonsense,” housing analyst Henry Pryor told EAT. “The Lib Dems believe there are 70–80,000, not the 38,500 Zoopla has dreamt up.

“The Valuation Office estimates that there are 250,000 homes worth over £1m, and houses in Band H – worth over £320,000 – for council tax purposes number 127,000, of which 57,000 are in London.”

Intrigued, we asked Zoopla how they did their sums. “We list every property in the country,” said a spokesman. “It is all about Zoopla having the most complete property database possible.”

He added: “The figure for the 38,500 homes is calculated from the proportion of homes worth over £2m on Zoopla, and extrapolated to include all UK properties.”

But Pryor was adamant the sums don’t add up: “I reckon that a mansion tax would work out at an average £12,270, not £32,270,” he said.  “But in any case, Zoopla have got hold of the wrong end of the stick.”

 

 

Comments

  • icon

    Henry is correct in that the average tax burden would be £12,270, however this makes it worse. There are 38,500 properties worth over £2m which would generate a tax take of £472m compared with the Lib Dem projection of £1.7bn (page 100,pt 4 of manifesto). In order to generate £1.7bn in tax from an average of £12,270 would mean there had to be 138,500 properties valued at over £2m which is 100,000 more than there actually are. Therefore the Lib Dems have a £1.2bn hole.

    • 28 April 2010 15:27 PM
  • icon

    The truth about Mr. Cable's emotive use of the word 'mansions' is that they are much more likely to be two bedroom flats should they be located, for instance, in prime central London areas.

    • 28 April 2010 15:00 PM
  • icon

    From the Land Registry, Sales Volumes report:

    The number of properties
    sold in England and Wales
    for over £1 million increased
    by 35 per cent between
    September 2008 and
    September 2009, from 378
    to 512.

    • 28 April 2010 14:22 PM
  • icon

    It doesn't really matter - none of them are being truthful. Just double the mansion tax - I'm a long way off affording a mansion.

    • 28 April 2010 14:01 PM
  • icon

    “We list every property in the country,”

    .....really?

    • 28 April 2010 10:00 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal