x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

A businessman whose home address, a bungalow in Dorset, is given online as the headquarters of an EPC firm, has told of his anguish and fury as bailiffs and angry customers turn up on his doorstep.

Allan Chester, founder and managing director of UK Postbox, a service which digitalises mail, lives in his family home in Dorset.

His address appears on the NextDay EPC website and now on the Assessor Direct website as well. But he says he is absolutely nothing to do with either business and knows nothing about EPCs.

Next to the Dorset address is a picture of a smart looking office which Mr Chester says is in Reading.

He said: “We started receiving post for NextDay EPC and then we found out that they were fraudulently using our address. We called the police and were given a crime number, but they say we are not a victim and will not take it any further.

“We are having bailiffs turn up at the rate of one a week – one of whom tried to barge his way into our home – and we have had old couples in their seventies at our front door, who are trying to sell their homes to move into care, and have been ripped off with nothing to show for it.

“I must also have had at least 20 DEAs here, unhappy because they have not been paid and feel they have been scammed.”

Mr Chester, who has pioneered digital postal services in the UK, claims his chief concern is the damage it could do to his own business, which he says has no contract of any sort with NextDay EPC or with Assessor Direct.

Meanwhile, the man ‘named and shamed’ by DEAs has totally denied having anything to do with any of the companies they claim to have identified, including NextDay EPC.

Complaints online, and claims made in the Energy Assessor Magazine, point the finger at Christopher Whatcott.

The article in Energy Assessor Magazine claims: “Assessors and customers on online forums are continuing to attack EPC provider NextDay EPC, which is only the latest in a long line of controversial web-based providers of HIPs and EPCs run by the same management.

“Many assessors say they have not been paid for EPCs by this and previous firms and some customers have not received certificates.”

The article claims: “NextDay EPC is run by Chris Whatcott, who was also responsible for HIP and EPC providers HipSave, HipServe and ExpressEPC, all of which ceased to operate, leaving a trail of debts in their wake.”

One DEA told EAT that he was owed £400. He said www.assessordirect.co.uk appeared to be exactly the same as NextDay EPC.

He also said that, in a new payment programme, DEAs now have to pay for customer leads and details through PayPal. Clients are then meant to pay the DEA for doing the job.
 
The DEA said he had reported the websites, which typically operate a reverse auction so that the lowest bidders get the job, to Trading Standards.

But Christopher Whatcott told EAT: “I am not sure where that DEA is getting his or her information from, but that website is nothing to do with me.

“It wasn’t that long ago that assessors thought I also owned metro epc and epc worx,  until recent events regarding those two companies have seemingly proved otherwise. I could be wrong, but if my memory serves me well, this was also mentioned in one of your previous articles.

“People seem to think that if it’s written in the DEA forums it must be true. All it seems to take is a single throwaway remark in those forums for people to start believing there is truth behind what is being said.”

Mr Whatcott has previously threatened legal proceedings against those who he says have been campaigning to ruin his business.

Meanwhile, it is not clear who does run the EPC sites being complained about, and it is a mystery as to why the address in Poole has been chosen.

EPC providers are not regulated, despite government enthusiasm for environmental legislation.

Comments

  • icon

    Trading Standards should investigate what is obviously another scam company? If they can't be arsed to police the agents use of epc's they should at least police the panel managers at the top of the chain.

    • 15 August 2011 09:01 AM
  • icon

    It's quite simple...all those DEA's who accepted instructions for peanuts from so called Providers and Panels only have themselves to blame.

    In accepting these instruction you all led the fee rates into the dustbin...how on earth did you think these providers were going to make any money after charging a Client £35 and paying you £25, did you really think £10 ish for them was going to stop them robbing you blind?

    I cam very close to being fleeced by a similar mob, but them contacted the Vendors and Solicitors involved threatening to cancel the EPC and notify TSO's the document would be null and void...I soon got paid!

    I severed all connections with panels/providers 18 months ago...got on my bike and went selling my services direct to EA's. I now earn treble the fee, work 7 days per week covering all strands of EPC, DEC, SAP & SBEMs.

    If you all stood together and turned you backs on providers and panels they wouldn't exist thus opening the market to individuals...as long as you can't be arsed to go out and sell your professionalism and rely on others to feed you things like this will continue...you only have yourselves to blame!

    Fraud is still Fraud though and the likes of this maggot should be locked up and the key thrown away, god forbid these morons may become letting agents and start chiselling tenants and Landlords...like one local one I did business with.

    • 12 August 2011 11:08 AM
  • icon

    Dear Mr Mr Whatcott: The two websites are EXACTLY the same!! Both are trading names of Global Energy Awareness .

    I would be surprised if anyone would imitate a person with their reputation. Odd that the latest website was registered at the same time as his demise.

    • 12 August 2011 09:31 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal