x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

London Mayor Boris Johnson has been told in no uncertain terms to butt out of the property market.

Property developers said he should not interfere – in direct contradiction to a call this week by the London Assembly for the Mayor to research the impact that overseas investment is having on the London housing market.

The Assembly suggested that foreign money is creating a ‘bubble’, and also called on the Mayor to examine the extent to which properties owned by foreign investors are kept empty or unused.

Caroline Pidgeon, who proposed the motion, said: “There is a real risk that overseas investment is creating an artificial housing bubble, inflating prices beyond the means of most.

“It’s vital more Londoners aren’t locked out of the capital, their chances of being able purchase their own homes decreasing year on year as prices are pushed sky high. We need to understand the effect overseas investment is having on the housing market, especially in terms of price, affordable housing and supply of homes for Londoners.

“This motion isn’t about penalising investment in London – it simply seeks assurance that the Mayor will take a strong look at the impact to ensure it will not damage neighbourhoods or price more residents out of the capital.”

Tom Copley, who seconded the motion, voiced his concerns. He said: “The capital is in desperate need of new housing, and we need to avoid some areas of London becoming ‘ghost towns’ as houses are bought for solely for investment rather than to be used as homes. We need to get away from looking at houses as assets and see them as homes instead.”

But property businesses warned Johnson off, saying that any interference could unsettle investors and put new financing for homes at risk.

Scott Hammond, executive director at Essential Living, a build-to-rent developer which has backing from a US pensions fund, said: “Policy makers rightfully want to encourage new housing investment, but it’s vital we refrain from tampering with the market as this provokes uncertainty which is a huge barrier for large funds and institutional investors.

“Councils already have the power to determine what gets built in the area and we would suggest that a greater focus needs to be given to private rented homes to cater for the needs of professional Londoners and families.”

John Hitchcox, the London entrepreneur who co-founded Yoo with Philippe Starck, said: “The current witch-hunt against prime housing through sky-high Stamp Duty and moves to block foreign buyers makes no sense.

“Many high-value buyers from abroad bring huge amounts of business with them and contribute hugely to the fabric of London. It makes no sense to determine who can buy a home based on where they originate from.”

Comments

  • icon

    *I am thinks - oops, an early night required :0)

    • 15 March 2013 16:24 PM
  • icon

    I have no problem with foreign people buying UK property as long as they live in it and when they do register it as their primary residence which I think will help cut tax evasion.
    If it is not utilsed, i am thinks we should have a tax that enourages utilisation such as Land Value Tax.

    • 15 March 2013 16:17 PM
  • icon

    Gets my vote Ray.

    This is a link to an article that, while long, offers an incredible insight into the shady dealings of who owns what with regard to prime Central London property.

    http://www.vanityfair.com/society/2013/04/mysterious-residents-one-hyde-park-london

    • 15 March 2013 14:52 PM
  • icon

    A thought......
    The sale of real property in this country should only be sold to British Nationals - foreigners could lease but not buy. Should apply to other things as well.
    Discuss?.........

    • 15 March 2013 14:44 PM
  • icon

    Dear John
    Many high-value buyers from abroad bring no business with them and contribute nothing to the fabric of London. This has a detrimental effect on the indengious population, as it can make stock unnaffordable.

    Dear Scott
    If you think the market should not be tampered with may I suggest you lobby for the schemes such as FLS be scrapped.

    • 15 March 2013 13:30 PM
  • icon

    Dwellings are for people to live in. Period. Boris is quite right, London is completely skewing all the property values in the land, and investment only properties are leaving swathes of cities/towns/villages empty while people are homeless. It is completely unChristian. Our people need homes, investment can be made in gold, jewellery whatever. The Government should make investment in non-occupied properties illegal, this is a small overcrowed island (thanks to overliberal immigration policies).

    • 15 March 2013 10:57 AM
  • icon

    Housing bubbles must be quite hard to furnish - all those curved walls.

    • 15 March 2013 09:47 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal