x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

In a recent article published on EAT, a member of Situ accused property lawyers (conveyancers) of failing to recruit to cope with increased demand in the property market. They argued that this is slowing down the home moving process and increasing the risk of transaction aborting.

In the same article, Situ member Andrew Oulsnam commented that estate agents are building their teams and lawyers are failing to follow suit.

Below I will try to explain why recruiting conveyancers is becoming an increasingly thankless task. But before I do, please consider two basic facts:

Most conveyancers work on a fixed fee basis and therefore don't want transactions to be delayed or to abort
It is relatively easier and quicker to find, recruit and train an estate agent than a conveyancer

Conveyancers are paid to make sure that buyers end up with a property without unknown restrictions coming to the fore, that they can live in it happily and can eventually sell without difficultly. Conveyancers normally have two clients that they owe a very high duty of care to, the buyer and the lender.

When I was working flat out as a conveyancer, about 10 years ago, my working week consisted of starting at 6.00 am, then spending the next three hours opening the post and DX, dictating as many replies to incoming letters and correspondence as was possible. Between the hours of 9.00 am and 5.00 pm I saw clients, took calls, exchanged contracts and tried to do some legal work' i.e. reading and perusing: Transfers, Conveyances, Title Deeds, Leases, Planning Permissions, Building Regulation Approvals, Replies to Enquiries, Guarantees, Mortgage Offers, Surveys, Solar Panel Agreements etc. I could go on and in reality the only time I could do most of this legal work' was when it was quiet, either after 5.00 pm or at the weekend.

If I didn't double dot every i' or cross every t' twice, I ran the risk of missing something and subsequently being sued by my client and/or the lender. The last thing I would want is a higher Professional Indemnity Insurance premium or being removed from a lender's panel.

In a recent case, won by Santander against law firm R A Legal, the judge said that if a conveyancer sent his Certificate of Title (CoT, the form requesting the mortgage advance) to a lender, before all title and other relevant checks had been completed to his satisfaction, he was being dishonest. Many exchanges and completions take place simultaneously or very close together these days. The main reason being that the conveyancer is being asked to agree a completion date that is only a few days away when they have not received all of the required documents or carried out all of the checks they should. However, in order to meet that completion date, many conveyancers have sent out their CoTs before they should (before exchange). A sensible and prudent conveyancer would now stop doing that, virtually making simultaneous exchange and completion a thing of the past.

I appreciate that some conveyancers are slow and uncommunicative but most are, more often than not, placed between a rock and a hard place. Conveyancing is a stressful, moderately paid job that requires experience, knowledge and a range of skills to execute properly. It is no wonder that those who left conveyancing are reluctant to return and youngsters are not flocking from universities to become one. I gave up in 2005 after nearly 30 years. Would I return Not over my dead body. But it doesn't matter what I think, my wife wouldn't let me because my work life balance is now much better.

There is no easy answer, but in an ideal world (or at least my ideal world), a conveyancer would start work at 8.00 am; work from 9.00 am to 5.00 pm with only essential interruptions and leave their offices by 6.00 pm. With this scenario in place, they wouldn't mind doing a few hours more on a Saturday or Sunday behind closed doors with no phones and no emails to interrupt them. Bliss!



Comments

  • icon

    Likewise PeeBee. Nearly 40 years in the business and still learning. Happy days.

    • 02 April 2014 17:25 PM
  • icon

    Hi Rob

    Thanks for the invite - but in reality you know them just as well as we do.

    I'm not disputing your article - just what 'Guest' has said relating to the "PUSHY AGENTS" comment - which I consider to be billshut. I take on board that this was added to your piece relating to being asked for confirmed completion dates - but at the end of the day that is directly linked to the 'modern' way of simultaneous exchange and completion which is the mother****er of all evil in our respective industries.

    I am sure that we would all welcome a return to a two-week gap were it ever made a requirement - if not only to bring the expectations of all parties into common line.

    Actually - I WILL take you to task on one point -
    "It is relatively easier and quicker to find, recruit and train an estate agent than a conveyancer."

    Not necessarily. In fact - some of the best Agents I know have been plying their trade for DECADES, and are still "in training".

    I learn something with every new sale; appraisal; person I meet.

    One day I might be half decent. In the meantime I'll do my best. ;o)

    Keep up the good work, Rob - someone has to now here...

    • 02 April 2014 16:59 PM
  • icon

    The purpose of my article was to try to explain why conveyancers have not built their teams quickly and to explain some of the day to day difficulties faced by conveyancers and to make it clear that barriers and blocks are not put in the way for no good reason.

    We all have similar objectives, the client, the agent and the conveyancer. To complete the transaction, as quickly and safely as is wanted and circumstances will allow, and for the agent and the conveyancer to get paid.

    Some agents are pushy (we all want to get paid promptly) and some conveyancers are slow (I have tried to explain why that might be, too many interruptions during the working day is one reason). A better understanding of the pressures we are all under should help us all get on a little better.

    PeeBee, why not put something together for conveyancers to read explaining your daily and weekly problems and pressures

    • 02 April 2014 16:23 PM
  • icon

    Oh dear. The above is just SO wrong, in SO MANY ways.

    Ask yourself the following.

    1. WHY would an Agent be asking for a confirmed completion date

    2. WHY is it so unrealistic that said Agent expects to be given said date when completion is, in your words, "only a few days away"

    3. WHY would said date be anticipated - achievable, even - within the said "few days" if the required documents and checks are NOT in place

    4. WHY is ANY of the above the 'fault' of "PUSHY AGENTS"

    The list goes on... I think that's enough to blow your entire "argument" out of the water as it is.

    • 02 April 2014 15:55 PM
  • icon

    The main reason being that the conveyancer is being asked to agree a completion date that is only a few days away when they have not received all of the required documents or carried out all of the checks they should. BY PUSHY AGENTS.

    • 02 April 2014 13:23 PM
  • icon

    Note taken.

    Which bit in particular would you like us to note most, 'Guest'

    • 02 April 2014 12:57 PM
  • icon

    Good article. All you estate agents should take note.

    • 02 April 2014 11:05 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal