x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.

The British Property Federation wants the Government and insurance companies to end what it calls uncertainty and lack of fairness in the Flood Re proposals.

Flood Re - a scheme which means annual insurance premiums will be capped and payouts for flood damage will come from a central pot of money - was meant to add a level of stability to the property industry as well as home owners.

But the BPF is worried that the Government currently wants to exclude leasehold and private rented properties from the measure because these categories are formally classified as commercial.

The Federation says the authorities cannot pick and choose which areas of the residential market they want to help. Without Flood Re, many agents fear that homes close to or within recently-flooded areas will be hard to sell as buyers investigate potential premiums.

Data from the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership shows there are at least 800,000 leasehold properties in England in flood risk areas, with 70,000 of those designated as being at high risk.

Floods do not discriminate, nor should the insurance industry. There's no justifiable reason to exclude leaseholders from Flood Re simply because they own a flat rather than a house. And it isn't fair to exclude almost four million PRS properties insists BPF policy director Ian Fletcher.

Comments

  • icon

    Please, someone, explain this to me -

    The TITLE states "Industry wants an end to flood uncertainty"

    Yet, the story (I use the term so loosely it falls around its' own ankles...) relates to an organisation known as 'The British Property Federation'.

    According to their website, "The British Property Federation is a membership organisation devoted to representing the interests of all those involved in real estate ownership and investment."

    Ahhh - THAT "industry"!

    • 27 February 2014 15:14 PM
  • icon

    Surely if someone is living there, paying a RESIDENTIAL insurance policy and council tax for the RESIDENTIAL property then they should be covered by this If it was flats above shops, and the flats weren't affected then fair enough, but a house/flat/bungalow is a house/flat/bungalow surely

    • 24 February 2014 16:18 PM
MovePal MovePal MovePal