x

Nick King

3895 Profile Views

About Me

my expertise in the industry

Nick's Recent Activity

From: Nick King 11 May 2018 07:59 AM

Good luck to him. Some people win the lottery, some people are fortunate football players, some people are merciless despots - some people work unstintingly all their lives for the good of others but get little more than a living wage. The world is far from fair. I'm sure that every one of Mr Fairburn's naysayers wouldn't refuse this fluky golden platter if offered to them.

From: Nick King 08 January 2018 13:51 PM

Proving that a particular neighbour type or group 'would' make it difficult to sell a property could be a difficulty in itself. And/or - any reference by the Agent, or others, that such would be the case strays into the realms of prejudice and racism. [Indeed, ironically, it is arguably the case that if there were no prior records of complaints against these specific noisy people (bear in mind that, as travellers, the occupying individuals probably change regularly !), this new owner, by his own complaints to Police, has now created some information he is obliged to disclose to his future prospective buyers !] My guess (if you look at the original newspaper article) is that it is fake news anyway (why no images of the land, its occupiers, nor views from the offended owner's window, etc ?).

From: Nick King 28 December 2017 11:02 AM

Irrespective of what 70% voted for ... I think Mr Lumsden probably makes a very fair point (albeit, I'm not privy to OTM's T's & C's). The original members all signed up to form a Mutual organisation. If that organisation subsequently wishes to change its fundamental status, as a matter of decency, the very least it should do is unconditionally offer to void the tie-in contracts to anyone who casts a 'No' vote.

From: Nick King 11 September 2017 08:05 AM

Sounds like a case of the blind leading the blind !

From: Nick King 13 January 2017 07:37 AM

Breaking News