x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
Chris's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
Chris Wood
4150
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
Chris's wall
Chris's
Recent Activity
Dave TP blocked me for raising concerns on social media. TP also took almost two years to respond to genuine and well argued/ evidenced instances of gaming the system with a simple, we have investigated this and closed the case, no explanation, nothing. You will, no doubt, have seen the transcript I published between myself and your rep in February which again raised the issues I have repeatedly highlighted with TP that, amongst other issues, TP have allowed Purplebricks (stock market ticker #PURP )to repeatedly state that all of their reviews are verified when it is patently not the case. This too breaks your own rules but, I'm guessing that TP don't want to upset a major client? That TP is now regularly and frequently appearing on consumer 'watchdog' programs and in the press speaks volumes. Do your business and sector a favour. Come clean, ditch any dodgy customers and engage with genuine complaints properly and in a timely manner.
From:
Chris Wood
23 March 2019 12:47 PM
Disruptive and existing business models that rely on this income could be in for a nasty shock. My guess is from the announcement above that NTSEAT will no longer allow a forced/ default choice of conveyancer such and will require a panel with, perhaps, more transparency over who receives what and how much, as IFAs' have to declare.
From:
Chris Wood
23 January 2019 15:57 PM
If by “success” you mean serially misleading consumers and investors, admitting >450 counts of Anti money laundering breaches & being questioned on a number of consumer programmes then, yes, a ‘success’.
From:
Chris Wood
14 January 2019 11:41 AM
Correction. I did not claim that Cornwall TSO were handling the case, I stated that I had spoken with them about the case and passed them the case information. This was made clear in a subsequent note on my blog.
From:
Chris Wood
16 August 2018 07:11 AM
Was this company in any way involved in a BMV outfit? (asking for a friend)
From:
Chris Wood
20 July 2018 11:13 AM
And the difference between this case and hundreds of individual companies all sub-contracting/ licensed to a major name in estate agency who sets a fixed price for all of them is....? Answers on a postcard please.
From:
Chris Wood
20 July 2018 11:11 AM
"The ASA is a non-statutory organisation and so cannot interpret or enforce legislation. " Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_Standards_Authority_(United_Kingdom) "Ultimately if advertisers and broadcasters persistently break the Advertising Codes and don’t work with us, we can and do refer them to other bodies for the further action, such as Trading Standards or Ofcom. " Source https://www.asa.org.uk/codes-and-rulings/sanctions.html Extract of email from the ASA to me: "because Zoopla have said that “withdrawn” properties could include properties sold by PurpleBricks on their own website. While I appreciate you took the data at face value, your reliance on it does render the claims in your ads misleading because your claims assume that all properties cited as “withdrawn” have not been sold. We have not concluded that all properties marked as withdrawn have been sold elsewhere. Instead, we have concluded that it cannot be assumed that all properties marked as withdrawn have ¬not been sold elsewhere" So, a property marked as "sold" in ZPG commercial data might be withdrawn and a property marked as withdrawn might be sold or still for sale, or either status or, in the case of more than one property we checked having three or more conflicting statuses over several sources of information (Purplebricks own website, Rightmove, HMRC and Zoopla). If simple headings cannot be relied upon, the data is unreliable. It is reasonable to rely on a commercial data suppliers' data. It is reasonable to expect where several data classifications are used in the same document that they do, indeed, represent that status. I.e. Sold means the property has sold (completed), for sale means the property is still for sale and, withdrawn means the property has been withdrawn which, logically and reasonably, given an alternative and clear status of 'sold' should indicate that the property has been withdrawn as unsold.
From:
Chris Wood
12 July 2018 21:48 PM
Mr Lawson. I am happy to stand by whatever Cornwall Trading Standards rule on this matter. They are the statutory authority who has jurisdiction over this matter. I am also happy to answer reasonable questions posed by anyone with reasonable intelligence and good manners. I am not of the opinion that you meet that criteria. Until such time as Cornwall TSO rule on this matter, there is no one with statutory authority who has made any ruling about the legality or otherwise of my post. Making verbal or written statements that imply or state otherwise should, therefore, be considered carefully. My article makes it clear that the sample refers to a specific geographic area and that the figures quoted nationally are an extrapolation of that area. A practice that many advertisers utilise but don't perhaps, always make so clear. The ASA also make it clear that the data on which the original blog was based was verified by ZPG as not having been tampered with or altered by me and, subsequently, allege that ZPG admits that the data headings supplied by ZPG may not be reliable. The ASA also imply that ZPG seem aware that they have commercially supplied information which may have been recorded differently on different databases without being cross-referenced against open source government data. Not directly related to my blog but you might also wish to consider that Mr Bruce CEO of Purplebricks PLC publicly stated to the BBC that his company sold (completed) on 88% of everything they list. His successor, when interviewed by the BBC, was very keen to water that down to a 78% listing to STC ratio. Perhaps you might like to direct your immense logic and time to find an answer to that question which thousands of people will almost certainly have used to rely on when choosing what to invest in or who to sell through.
From:
Chris Wood
12 July 2018 17:53 PM
Mr Lawson. I would advise that you choose your wording very carefully on this or in any written or verbal form.
From:
Chris Wood
12 July 2018 11:58 AM
If the ASA, a non-Gov body with no statutory authority attempts to take any action which might damage my name or business prior to any formal ruling from Cornwall Trading Standards, it should be aware legal action may follow.
From:
Chris Wood
12 July 2018 07:36 AM
I would welcome that case as they will have to supply their data prior to any court case. They have already threatened me with a cease and desist order but went silent when I reminded them of that fact. Readers may draw their own conclusions as to why that was the case.
From:
Chris Wood
11 July 2018 10:12 AM
There was no slip Simon. The data headings from ZPG proved not to be entirely reliable, however, once checked, they still show PB selling far less than the 88% claimed Nationally at least in the area I researched and much closer to the National List to Sold figures claimed by Jefferies that caused such a press storm a little while ago.
From:
Chris Wood
11 July 2018 10:10 AM
My formal response to the ASA ruling https://blog.pdq-estates.co.uk/2018/07/11/response-to-todays-asa-ruling/
From:
Chris Wood
11 July 2018 06:57 AM
Poor man and his family. Im sure everyone’s thoughts go go out to them.
From:
Chris Wood
27 November 2017 07:39 AM
Can you please send evidence of that if possible? Thank you (Graham Norwood at EAT has my email address or can be found on my LinkedIn profile) Chris Wood
From:
Chris Wood
14 September 2017 13:55 PM
Ha! There is screenshot evidence of PBs' clients claiming the LPEs' were a) pressuring them to give good reviews and b) offering financial inducements (discounted fees) if they give good reviews. This information has been passed to (and apparently ignored by) Trustpilot. TP talks the talk but doesn't appear able to wealk the walk in terms of policing reviews and it's policy is 'flexible'. TP also continues to allow multiple reviews of different companies (LPEs') to be aggregated to Purplebricks PLC. A very clear breach of TPs' own rules and highly misleading.
From:
Chris Wood
14 September 2017 12:00 PM
It is, anonymous poster. Why the NAEA/ Propertymark board and exec have questions to answer and why I resigned as President Elect all those years ago. https://blog.pdq-estates.co.uk/2017/09/13/why-the-naea-propertymark-board-has-questions-to-answer-and-why-i-previously-resigned-as-president-elect/
From:
Chris Wood
13 September 2017 12:27 PM
I respect the business model of PB and, as I have said previously, I worked with a much larger PLC on just such a project almost a decade ago. Where I have issue is how often PB make claims that are unsubstantiated, use bully-boy tactics to silence negative customer reviews and legitimate journalists questions (just ask some of the broadsheets how often they have been threatened) and, seemingly, appears to be able to operate in a way that would land other agents in a great deal of legal trouble (E.g. that almost all of its franchisees had no individual redress until June of 2016 and that none of the 100 or so recently checked LPEs had any form of ICO or HMRC AML registration. The wording on those two organisations websites about non-compliance from agents being unambiguous and clear. Always happy to compete fairly on a level playing field with other players playing by the same equally enforced rules.
From:
Chris Wood
03 July 2017 11:49 AM
The headline is not correct. Michael Bruce very carefully says "that 83% of instructions end in a sale" He emphatically does not say that HIS company sells them and it is a VERY important distinction.
From:
Chris Wood
03 July 2017 08:54 AM
Describing a competitor as "the enemy" is not helpful and merely strengthens the company itself, and the argument of those who see no value in the full service model. The business model is not wrong, it is the way in which they conduct themselves that is so often the problem. If CIELA wish to be taken seriously they should focus on all agents of all business models that are not playing fair. I wish CIELA the best of luck but I honestly believe that the best way for all law-abiding and hard-working agents to achieve the result they seek (of a fair, level playing field) is to join or re-join the NAEA and work for change from within its auspices rather than trying to re-invent the wheel. Certainly the NAEA itself needs to change, and I for one hope to be part of that change, however it offers an established proven organisation that still retains some currency within the media as a reliable trade body and professional organisation.
From:
Chris Wood
21 March 2017 07:26 AM
Call-centre agents as a whole, currently have less than 4% of the market, DOWN from a claimed (note, claimed by call-centre agents) '6% and climbing' in 2016.
From:
Chris Wood
06 March 2017 08:08 AM
A cartel is a cartel. If agents want to be taken seriously as the trustworthy face of agency, they cannot expect different treatment when they knowingly break the law. These agents have just handed a wonderful PR coup to those agents who claim they are breaking the mould of 'dodgy/ high-cost' agents and are looking after consumers interests by 'cutting fees'.
From:
Chris Wood
02 March 2017 15:43 PM
What was a case of PMA and is a breach of CPR is 'informally resolved" by the ASA. Given that before a complaint can be considered by the ASA the company concerned must have already refused failed to reach agreement directly with the complainant, this shows again what a toothless wonder the ASA is.
From:
Chris Wood
18 January 2017 05:02 AM
I wish the club luck but I would argue the best solution is to encourage all agents to work to high standards and such organisations already exist, even if many believe they have not been particularly effective of late. Why reinvent the wheel? Just change the tyres.
From:
Chris Wood
17 January 2017 07:11 AM
In the meantime, Countrywide employees appear to be scrambling to get out of the company as fast as they can.
From:
Chris Wood
13 January 2017 05:58 AM
Even if they did, it would most likely be 'informally resolved'. The ASA are effectively a waste of space
From:
Chris Wood
08 December 2016 10:15 AM
The facts are that prior to June of this year when the TPO received a very urgent batch request to process all of PBs LPEs', almost none of PBs LPEs were registered with an approved redress scheme and, as of three weeks ago, none of the sample of ten LPEs' I checked were registered for HMRC money laundering or ICO. Basic legal requirements. This is a company trading as a PLC. There is also a great deal of evidence which suggests that their property stock requires and is, I understand, now under investigation.
From:
Chris Wood
22 November 2016 15:15 PM
Some agents undoubtedly dislike change however, that is not the issue here. The issue is that PB seem to continually flout the law (many LPEs' did/ continue to lack of membership of a redress scheme, not registered for HMRC , ICO, strong evidence suggesting there may be systemic, endemic portal juggling, as well as pre IPO claiming 'experts' had formal qualifications when they didn't etc.). Being innovative is to be applauded, doing so legally is a must.
From:
Chris Wood
22 November 2016 12:00 PM
If only these LPEs' had registered with an approved redress scheme, HMRC money laundering and with the ICO as they are legally required to be. Some, no doubt, are however, when I last checked, every single LPE was not trading legally in one way or another.
From:
Chris Wood
22 November 2016 06:39 AM
This article may help: Portal juggling – What is it, and why you should care | PDQ Property In West Cornwall http://bit.ly/portaljuggle
From:
Chris Wood
16 November 2016 07:31 AM
Very glad to see the RICS finally making a statement on this fraud. It is not just the fact that consumers are being misled by falsely advertised listing dates but, that the portals then 'launder' and legitimise this data into charts allowing those agents to then defraud both sellers and investors.
From:
Chris Wood
15 November 2016 06:44 AM
"Jefferies cites as evidence last week’s Land Registry data showing transactions in England were down 32 per cent year on year and down 54 per cent in inner London." Bad news for Countrywide but worse news for those agents/ investors who have bought into a fixed fee business model that relies on ever increasing volumes to make a profit. A 30% drop in transactions is going to require a massive budget spend to make up the difference in market share just to stand still = business model - blown
From:
Chris Wood
25 October 2016 07:45 AM
Two words, one of which is crucial: 'retail' 'expert'.
From:
Chris Wood
17 October 2016 07:49 AM
The ASA tries to give the impression it is an official body that can take direct action against companies which is misleading. The worst they can do is name and shame or, pass the complaint on to an already underfunded and overstretched Trading Standards (TS). Perhaps the ASA will consider funding TS to help deliver results that are respected by the industry and are actually likely to deter offenders.
From:
Chris Wood
13 October 2016 11:32 AM
Another 'informal basis' resolution. It may be appropriate in this case but the phrase is now as much an ASA cliche as a bad joke.
From:
Chris Wood
12 October 2016 07:11 AM
If you define a number of national names in estate agency allegedly deliberately defrauding investors, the public and obtaining an unfair advantage over law-abiding agents earning/ costing millions of pounds in the process, then I would say your definition of causing "no-loss" holds water.
From:
Chris Wood
29 September 2016 14:30 PM
Using fee 'data' that came from a survey (not clean, verifiable data) that is five years out of date, rather than the far more recent, published, comprehensive and verifiable data by Premier Property Lawyers in 2015 showing fees averaging a significantly lower 1.2%.
From:
Chris Wood
20 September 2016 06:34 AM
Another story to irk the Quirk
From:
Chris Wood
15 September 2016 11:48 AM
'Hopefully'
From:
Chris Wood
12 August 2016 09:18 AM
Hope fully Rightmove will pull its head out of its backside, acknowledge they haven't policed this issue and have been failing their customers/ in breach of contract and rectify this and, that those firms who have been the most persistent offenders (amongst others, a large PLC who have threatened legal actions on occasions about this matter) will now face prosecutions.
From:
Chris Wood
12 August 2016 09:17 AM
Watch and wait. Give it a few more days and I believe this story will grow
From:
Chris Wood
26 July 2016 07:36 AM
We disagree and I'm afraid your lack of knowledge of the industry is such that I don't believe the time I currently have available today allows me to explain how that lack of knowledge is leading you to the wrong conclusions. Thanks for engaging
From:
Chris Wood
22 July 2016 12:32 PM
I have said for many years that the world of estate agency needs to lose around a third of agents as they are simply not up to the job or, in some cases, criminally incompetent. Of the remaining two thirds, around half are 'ok', with the remainder being excellent. If someone is selling what is usually their most valuable asset, it makes sense to employ genuine experts who know how to value, fully market, negotiate the best price and then nurse the sale through to completion. Genuinely expert knowledge and skills do not come cheap. In your example those properties may well be advertised on the same marketing channels but the level and amount of service and skill required to bring both to a successful and profitable conclusion may be immensely different due to individual customer and property circumstances and requirements.
From:
Chris Wood
22 July 2016 10:19 AM
Estate agents already successfully compete with Purplebricks* but this story is not about about Zoopla 'allowing' estate agents to compete with PurpleBricks, it is about Zoopla gearing up to make estate agency firms as we now know them, redundant. The logical end-game is to become a mega-hybrid agent itself. It's only customers will be its listers. *Purplebricks do not seem to wish to compete fairly and appear to believe that the law of the land does not apply to them having failed to register their 'LPEs' with an approved redress scheme or HMRC for money laundering etc. Of the advertised 180 plus LPEs that contract to PB, I randomly checked half a dozen. Not one appeared to be legally compliant.
From:
Chris Wood
19 July 2016 07:58 AM
Congratulations on the new appointments. I hope that this will be the resurgence of an NAEA/ ARLA/ NFOPP that actually wishes to speak out for its members and good estate agency
From:
Chris Wood
21 June 2016 06:56 AM
And how many of those LPEs' (sic) were and are now, legally registered with an approved redress scheme along with money laundering, PI, PL insurance, ICO etc?
From:
Chris Wood
16 June 2016 07:06 AM
Contrary to what many believe, I'm not anti-hybrid or call-centre models (I was working on such a model years ago with Tesco/ RBS) as long as they trade fairly and don't make wild, misleading or unsubstantiated claims.
From:
Chris Wood
20 May 2016 13:32 PM
A huge problem and hats off to Michelle and the team for identifying this and other issues within the property market. However, the likelihood that this will have a major effect outside of the capital is small; predominantly as the ultra expensive end of the market, fuelled by foreign money being poured in to clean or protect it from prying eyes, is almost a market within a market and, thus, has an unintentional but real firewall.
From:
Chris Wood
20 May 2016 06:41 AM
“We now charge less and offer more than many traditional agents, thanks to OTM” - By what measure Russell? Remember, you have form at the ASA. “OTM has actually been a godsend for businesses like eMoov and our competitors like Purplebricks, both in terms of our story with investors, ability to raise capital and our story with consumers and the ability to win instructions” - An interesting interpretation of the current market share of call-centre agents when market share is sub 3.5%, falling and eMoovs' own new customer numbers are only being bolstered by a huge 30%+ price slashing sale for the past two months.
From:
Chris Wood
17 May 2016 06:27 AM
Odd, though, that the NAEA and RICS remain stony silent on Money Laundering and portal juggling.
From:
Chris Wood
16 May 2016 07:51 AM
A recent example of the ease of placing many fake reviews was on 'LovePad.co.uk' which claimed that they were simply 'testing the system' after a News story exposed the issue. Trust Pilot reviews can seemingly be easily breached and cannot be 'trusted' as a result.
From:
Chris Wood
12 May 2016 07:35 AM
My view on the EU is that it has achieved some positive points in the past but is trying to be something that no-one wants it to be and, it is falling apart at the seams. Greece is a basket case that the bureaucrats in Brussels wish to impose undemocratic cabaal of civil servants to run it, much like they did with Italy. Italy, France and Portugal are all broke and waiting to implode with Germans becoming increasingly (and understandably) unwilling to have their hard earned wages be used to bail out failed states who can't budget We don't know what leaving might mean (though I take a realistically, generally positive view) but we DO know that staying in will lead to greater integration and loss of sovereignty as well as a strong likelihood of us having to bail out an increasingly politically unstable and financially failed/ failing countries with pressure to accept/ no ability to stop vast numbers of economic migrants placing an even greater burden on our primary services. Monetary union was an unmitigated disaster for many countries but is a natural progression for anyone remaining in the european super-state ran by thousands of very highly paid, unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels who see ever greater expansion as a means to provide jobs for the boys and girls. Gravy train politics. 'OUT' makes sense on so many levels
From:
Chris Wood
09 May 2016 17:32 PM
I would urge everyone to take a few minutes of your day to make their views known.
From:
Chris Wood
09 May 2016 08:36 AM
Project fear has just turned from comical to downright ridiculous
From:
Chris Wood
09 May 2016 08:12 AM
Hi Richard. Stating that leaving the EU would lead to uncertainty in the housing market doesn't explain why you believe it would have such an effect. We (the UK) have a huge demand for property and a general undersupply. With the vast majority of buyers being UK residents I fail to see how any case can be made that there will be any significant shift in property values outside what might normally be expected within a statistical variation. The only current drop in value is due to the much overdue readjustment of the London market due to drop in mega-wealthy foreign investors 'buy to leave' investments/ money laundering (take your pick)
From:
Chris Wood
04 May 2016 13:43 PM
Have a quiet word with them but if they refuse to remove, they are in breach of the law and should be reported to Trading Standards.
From:
Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:29 AM
No they don't, no they don't and I have no idea on OTM. Despite saying they do, there is ample evidence to show that many agents are portal juggling on an industrial scale and that the portal are talking out of the side of their mouths when it comes to policing this.
From:
Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:28 AM
But absolutely no explanation of how a Brexit could result in a fall in the housing market.
From:
Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:03 AM
James, as the proprietor of a business that is a member of TPOS you are required to have a good knowledge of the TPOS code, CPR and the 1979 Estate Agents Act etc. and, as such, I am sure you are aware that this 'tactic', no matter how widespread it may be, is illegal. If you don't understand why, this article may help - Portal juggling – What is it, and why you should care | PDQ Property In West Cornwall http://bit.ly/portaljuggle
From:
Chris Wood
28 April 2016 10:30 AM
I'm not a fan of OTM but wish it well however, this is pure mischief making by Mr Quirk who seems to have a well-trained pet in Anna White at the Telegraph who seems willing to print what he says without checking her facts first.
From:
Chris Wood
22 April 2016 08:19 AM
Congratulations Graham!
From:
Chris Wood
24 March 2016 07:15 AM
So the 'local'; agent covering my area wasn't as advertised 'local' after all they want a more locally type local.
From:
Chris Wood
23 March 2016 08:03 AM
More temper tantrums from Mr Quirk. It seems from eMoovs' diminishing customer numbers and the static market-share of call-centre agents in general, that potential sellers "couldn't give a toss" about many of the claims he makes and are choosing agents with genuine local knowledge and skills instead.
From:
Chris Wood
21 March 2016 07:17 AM
Excellent and well-written article Graham. What will play out over the next few month will have nothing to do with blind hope but on simple hard economic forces
From:
Chris Wood
18 January 2016 07:29 AM
The future of (most) estate agency business' is a hybrid one in my view, much like the American model however, PB are making an exceptionally poor job of this. PB have knowingly made misleading statements during their IPO and since about the qualifications of their 'experts'. They have failed to respond promptly and professionally to legitimate questions about these matters and, if the (unmoderated) reviews on their Facebook page are to be believed, they are failing customers badly (contrasting totally, with the reviews on the moderated, official, reviews page). It also has to be said that, along with some other big-name agents, PBs' listings seem to be suffering regular 'technical issues' which seem to have the effect that customers homes appear to be on the market for less time than they really have. No doubt, Rightmoves current investigation into technical issues and mal-practice will reveal more information. We can only hope that Zoopla also carries out a similar exercise.
From:
Chris Wood
15 January 2016 08:40 AM
I'm not quite sure how Tepilo intends to pull off a twenty percent plus increase in turnover* when their new instruction rate has fallen by 30% from 1,168 to 823 over the past six months. Low fee agents depend on turnover and the UK is seeing a shortage of stock and, does not appear to embracing on-line by the look of market share figures either. *With a 'back of a fag packet' estimated average monthly income (based on Tepilos' basic £595 package) of 1,111 new customers per month = £660,747.5 PCM = annualised income of £7,928,970 this year.
From:
Chris Wood
11 December 2015 15:17 PM
It's always good News when any agent takes greater steps to professionalism and I'm sure I am not alone in estate agency circles in hoping that the new faces in the management team will herald a new era of professionalism from an organisation that has a rather patchy reputation within the industry in some parts of the UK.
From:
Chris Wood
19 August 2015 07:53 AM
Thanks for the support gentlemen. I have no problem with alternative business models as long as they play fair and don't mislead consumers as eMoov clearly have been for some time
From:
Chris Wood
03 June 2015 17:44 PM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Government orders London Mayor to build more homes
Prime London sold prices hit decade low but agents ‘remain busy’ - research
Price expectation gap risks widening – claim
Material information raises professional indemnity risks - warning
Upmarket agency launches second radio ad campaign
Estate agency complaints and payouts on the rise
Rightmove: Asking prices hit 10-month high but market remains sensitive
Seller sentiment improves – OnTheMarket
Propertymark welcomes new First Minister for Wales
Spring Budget missed the mark, estate agents claim
Chris's Recent Activity
From: Chris Wood
23 March 2019 12:47 PM
From: Chris Wood
23 January 2019 15:57 PM
From: Chris Wood
14 January 2019 11:41 AM
From: Chris Wood
16 August 2018 07:11 AM
From: Chris Wood
20 July 2018 11:13 AM
From: Chris Wood
20 July 2018 11:11 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 July 2018 21:48 PM
From: Chris Wood
12 July 2018 17:53 PM
From: Chris Wood
12 July 2018 11:58 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 July 2018 07:36 AM
From: Chris Wood
11 July 2018 10:12 AM
From: Chris Wood
11 July 2018 10:10 AM
From: Chris Wood
11 July 2018 06:57 AM
From: Chris Wood
27 November 2017 07:39 AM
From: Chris Wood
14 September 2017 13:55 PM
From: Chris Wood
14 September 2017 12:00 PM
From: Chris Wood
13 September 2017 12:27 PM
From: Chris Wood
03 July 2017 11:49 AM
From: Chris Wood
03 July 2017 08:54 AM
From: Chris Wood
21 March 2017 07:26 AM
From: Chris Wood
06 March 2017 08:08 AM
From: Chris Wood
02 March 2017 15:43 PM
From: Chris Wood
18 January 2017 05:02 AM
From: Chris Wood
17 January 2017 07:11 AM
From: Chris Wood
13 January 2017 05:58 AM
From: Chris Wood
08 December 2016 10:15 AM
From: Chris Wood
22 November 2016 15:15 PM
From: Chris Wood
22 November 2016 12:00 PM
From: Chris Wood
22 November 2016 06:39 AM
From: Chris Wood
16 November 2016 07:31 AM
From: Chris Wood
15 November 2016 06:44 AM
From: Chris Wood
25 October 2016 07:45 AM
From: Chris Wood
17 October 2016 07:49 AM
From: Chris Wood
13 October 2016 11:32 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 October 2016 07:11 AM
From: Chris Wood
29 September 2016 14:30 PM
From: Chris Wood
20 September 2016 06:34 AM
From: Chris Wood
15 September 2016 11:48 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 August 2016 09:18 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 August 2016 09:17 AM
From: Chris Wood
26 July 2016 07:36 AM
From: Chris Wood
22 July 2016 12:32 PM
From: Chris Wood
22 July 2016 10:19 AM
From: Chris Wood
19 July 2016 07:58 AM
From: Chris Wood
21 June 2016 06:56 AM
From: Chris Wood
16 June 2016 07:06 AM
From: Chris Wood
20 May 2016 13:32 PM
From: Chris Wood
20 May 2016 06:41 AM
From: Chris Wood
17 May 2016 06:27 AM
From: Chris Wood
16 May 2016 07:51 AM
From: Chris Wood
12 May 2016 07:35 AM
From: Chris Wood
09 May 2016 17:32 PM
From: Chris Wood
09 May 2016 08:36 AM
From: Chris Wood
09 May 2016 08:12 AM
From: Chris Wood
04 May 2016 13:43 PM
From: Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:29 AM
From: Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:28 AM
From: Chris Wood
04 May 2016 07:03 AM
From: Chris Wood
28 April 2016 10:30 AM
From: Chris Wood
22 April 2016 08:19 AM
From: Chris Wood
24 March 2016 07:15 AM
From: Chris Wood
23 March 2016 08:03 AM
From: Chris Wood
21 March 2016 07:17 AM
From: Chris Wood
18 January 2016 07:29 AM
From: Chris Wood
15 January 2016 08:40 AM
From: Chris Wood
11 December 2015 15:17 PM
From: Chris Wood
19 August 2015 07:53 AM
From: Chris Wood
03 June 2015 17:44 PM