x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Introducer today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
J's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
J T
.
1822
Profile Views
About Me
.
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
.
J's wall
J's
Recent Activity
Competition is healthy, everyone agrees to that. But this article and situation has tried to portray these agents as bad as drug barons. It's not unfair to the consumer due to there being a ton of online agents now who charge a tiny amount as it is. These vendors still have those options. I can't say exactly why these agents have come to the conclusion they did but I can only see a conversation where, after discussing the problems facing estate agents today, they saw an option. 'Let's all agree to have the same fee, that way the business we get is down to how hard we work for it and not just an attractive price tag with no backing.' Or am I being too naive here?
From:
J T
02 March 2017 15:30 PM
Give up OTM, it's getting sad
From:
J T
06 January 2017 09:18 AM
Why is it that anytime anything new comes in to this industry people tear it down? This industry is filled with dinosaurs that don't like change. Embrace technology and move along with it, otherwise you'll find yourself left behind. There will undoubtedly be teething problems with this which is why it's being 'tested' but let's not make ourselves look stupid and write it off. The online agent has been laughed at, yet they're doing well. Again, some of you will say there are many complaints with the online agent....have a look around, there's many complaints with all agents. If you're showing a property that hasn't been touched in 40 years, would you tell the viewer that it's still good to go and in line with the modern day style or would you say it's in need of updating?
From:
J T
31 October 2016 12:52 PM
I agree, are all these over 65's moving in to the same house? Otherwise where does that figure come from?
From:
J T
28 October 2016 17:46 PM
OTM is not the answer.
From:
J T
28 October 2016 17:43 PM
She's spent a 'year dealing with estate agents' yet writes an article that shows she's clearly learned nothing and just has a chip on her shoulder.
From:
J T
07 October 2016 09:33 AM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
New high end agency puts emphasis on lifestyle presentation
Mortgage rates hit six month high after recent bank hikes
PropTech product claims to convert past contacts into future instructions
Three interest rate cuts and house prices to rise - Lloyds Bank
Sales Boost at last for Prime Central London - agency data
House prices fall for 15 months in Wales - now transactions down too
Coup for Self-Employed Agency Brand as high flying agent joins
Radical reform of Right To Buy demanded by industry group
Call for improved training for Energy Performance Certificate assessors
Training service expands activities with two agent certificates
J's Recent Activity
From: J T
02 March 2017 15:30 PM
From: J T
06 January 2017 09:18 AM
From: J T
31 October 2016 12:52 PM
From: J T
28 October 2016 17:46 PM
From: J T
28 October 2016 17:43 PM
From: J T
07 October 2016 09:33 AM