x

Philip Bullman

2392 Profile Views

About Me

my expertise in the industry

Philip's Recent Activity

The only problem with your argument John is that the losses an agent has suffered in reduced business outweighs every argument for supporting this stillborn venture, as an agent you cannot tell a client advertising with OTM is in their interest, because the only interest is the ego of OTM, who are now spending members money in the courts on forcing an agency group to stay on board, its no wonder agents who can are running a mile now! Simons opinion is simply voicing what everyone else is thinking..

From: Philip Bullman 31 October 2016 13:03 PM

I cant understand why OTM want to go head to head with dissatisfied agents, the adverse publicity will surely prevent any new agents joining, and if these agents prove OTM to have breached their contract then more will walk, should have let them go quietly I say

From: Philip Bullman 19 April 2016 12:26 PM

I will tell you why Paul... we were sold the dream but bought the nightmare, OTM were full of promise, they were going to be no.2 in 18 month have 7500 members by January 2015 traffic deals, none of which they have delivered on, they have let agents in for free with a letter of intent(breach of contract) none of the potential clients we questioned up until Sept last year were aware of OTM , there terms of contract would be deemed unfair terms in a court, yet they are happy to unhinge their offering by starting legal action, who in their right mind would join them now, why would anyone take the risk knowing they are ineffective, they have dragged a few suckers in to give positive reviews, but still they are invisible to vendors and landlords.... I think a class action would kick OTM into touch !

From: Philip Bullman 08 April 2016 11:30 AM

Breaking News