x
By using this website, you agree to our
use of cookies
to enhance your experience.
SEARCH
Search
STAY
CONNECTED!
Sign in
Sign in
New here? Sign up
Feedback
My Account
Feedback
Sign out
×
Make Today's Website as home page
Menu
Estate agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Letting agent today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Landlord today
News
Features
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Investor today
News
Guides & Tips
NEW
Trade Directory
Archive
Advertise with us
Property Jobs Today
Home
Find a Job
Search Recruiters
Recruiters
New
Nabby's
Personal Profile
View my company profile
Nabby Siril
986
Profile Views
About Me
Send message
View company profile
Follow all comments made
my expertise in the industry
Nabby's wall
Nabby's
Recent Activity
Rob Davies, As I have said in a post below, perhaps Adam Day happened to EasyProperty? Founder of Hatched who moved to EasyProperty last year?
From:
Nabby Siril
20 September 2018 17:05 PM
Directors have to make excuses for their failure somehow. They are not going to admit they made a poor purchase, or that they were behind in the race, or that they did not have the expertise to play catch up. What was the attraction to Hatched over, say, Purple Bricks or Yopa or E/Ewe/Moo/Mov? Nothing. I have not seen any figures but I bet nobody in the general public had even heard of them. A good few have heard of the others though. Also, someone above said what happened to EasyProperty. Perhaps Adam Day, the founder of Hatched, who went to EasyProperty last year, is what happened to EasyProperty? I wouldnt read too much into this. It has been long predicted that the online/hybrid space is going to shrink to just a few players. Why would anymore than that be needed when they are national and the whole point of them is economies of scale and efficiencies? Just like there are not a dozen Amazons.
From:
Nabby Siril
20 September 2018 17:04 PM
Same argument could be made here as is made against tenant fees. The agent has a monopoly on that property, the buyer cannot "shop around" unless the property is a very bog standard naff new build. If the agent is working for the seller, the seller should be the one paying them. The seller has the power to shop around. If this catches on the housing market is just going to attract even more attention from government. Basically what they are saying is they could not compete, and now they have decided to go shady.
From:
Nabby Siril
14 September 2018 11:38 AM
Should be called "Agents do PR"
From:
Nabby Siril
31 August 2018 00:13 AM
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Breaking News
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Video Archieve
Today 14:58
Portal Discussions
Joined Group From: Your Community
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Viewed From: Industry View
Today 14:58
Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet
Conversation Comment in: Interior Design
Today 14:58
×
Send a message
Message
×
Write on Wall
Message
×
Send a message
Reply to:
Message
Breaking News
Agents urged to show their pride on LGBT issues
Property firms failing to adapt AML processes despite Russian sanctions - claim
Google SEO changes may have pushed agency websites down search rankings - warning
Bowled over! Venue announced for prestigious agency awards
Sales guru partners with KnowYourMarket to deliver bespoke data-led training
A third of property professionals suffer burnout from heavy workloads and client demands
My First Property Sale: 'I earned £75 and wonder if the old system was better'
One in 10 homes going under offer within a fortnight – claim
Major agent revises house price forecasts upwards amid slower stock recovery
Going digital! Over 100k sales complete with digitised Land Registry data
Nabby's Recent Activity
From: Nabby Siril
20 September 2018 17:05 PM
From: Nabby Siril
20 September 2018 17:04 PM
From: Nabby Siril
14 September 2018 11:38 AM
From: Nabby Siril
31 August 2018 00:13 AM