A prominent law expert is claiming that a high profile case of property fraud, reported earlier this week, involved a “devastating lack of due diligence.”
On Tuesday we reported a BBC interview which revealed that a man’s house was sold and his furnishings removed without his knowledge.
The Reverend Mike Hall was working away from his property in Luton and tipped off by neighbours that building work was under way in his home. Hall's identity had been stolen and used to sell the house and the fraudster was able to bank the proceeds.
Now Sophie Swanborough, of legal sector risk mitigation consultancy Lawyer Checker says: “The cyber crime risk that conveyancers face is unfortunately a threat that is ever-growing and evolving. The SRA reported that during the first lockdown when lots of firm’s hurried to adapt to a new way of working, there was a 337 per cent rise in reported phishing scams.
“This recent news report about a man’s house being ‘stolen’, is all the more shocking as the audacity and impudence of the criminal when aligned with the devastating lack of due diligence across the whole home buying process, meant such a situation occurred.
“Ensuring demonstrable due diligence practice is in place across every transaction is of vital importance. Utilising Lawyer Checker’s Consumer Bank Account Checker to validate the destination of funds is an easy way to incorporate such measures. Conveyancers can also be assured of a fellow firm’s bank details before transferring funds by utilising a Lawyer Checker Account & Entity Screen search. Also, confirming a client’s identity and source of funds is simple when using the Thirdfort ID Checker to give firm’s assurance when onboarding clients. All simple, yet effective approaches that can easily be adapted into every conveyancing case.”
This principle has been endorsed at the conveyancing industry’s highest level.
A statement from the Conveyancing Association says in the case of the Luton property, circumstances aligned with a lack of conveyancing due diligence.
Those unfortunate circumstances were set out by the Conveyancing Association as:
- Empty / irregularly inhabited properties with no mortgage are at particular risk and would make it much easier for criminals to commit such offences;
- The criminal intercepts post to the said property, potentially with a simple postal redirect request;
- With access to personal documents, in this instance the victim’s driving license, the criminal can set up a bank account in the victim’s name;
- Without conducting appropriate due diligence on the ‘client’, it’s easy to see how sale funds can be sent to the wrong place. The conveyancer’s position of trust with client’s funds deserves appropriate checks so that heart-breaking mistakes like this don’t go unnoticed.
You can see the EAT story on the Luton fraud here.