By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Stamp Duty Holiday - Zoopla shows how it could help the housing market

Zoopla’s head of research says a stamp duty holiday could encourage more home owners to move which in turn could help fuel economic activity in other sectors.

The argument comes from Grainne Gilmore in new research for EAT; this is the first of monthly pieces on issues relevant  to agents, produced by Zoopla’s research team. 

Gráinne Gilmore, Head of Research, Zoopla, writes:


Calls for a stamp duty holiday to kick start the housing market are intensifying. Lockdown restrictions impacted the market significantly, so it makes sense that a tax break could help boost the market as activity starts to resume.

The government will want to examine the fundamentals carefully. If housing transactions fall this year, stamp duty receipts will drop - latest HMRC data shows that total stamp duty receipts fell by 43 per cent in April.

How does a stamp duty holiday work?

By cutting the stamp duty bill to zero, more homeowners could be encouraged to move. 

The ‘holiday’ means there is impetus to act, as it is not a permanent change. While this could expedite activity that would have happened anyway, when trying to kick-start the economy this is accepted.

A stamp duty holiday not only helps people across the country achieve their housing goals, it also contributes to economic activity.

When people move home, their consumption of goods and services increases as they organise their finances and utilities, decorate and renovate. This ‘network’ effect on the economy means that governments are always keen to stimulate housing mobility.

Have there been stamp duty holidays in the past, and did they work?

Yes, and sometimes.

A good example is the stamp duty holiday of late 1991 to Autumn 1992 during the recession as the housing market was slumping (amid very high interest rates). The threshold for paying stamp duty (one per cent) was raised temporarily from £30,000 to £250,000. The average house price was just over £50,000.

Despite this intervention, transactions in 1992 were still lower than in 1991, and house prices fell. But, these figures could have looked much worse without a stamp duty holiday.

During the financial crisis in 2008-09, another stamp duty holiday was introduced, raising the stamp duty threshold (one per cent, or three and four per cent for more expensive properties) from £125,000 to £175,000. The average house price was just under £175,000.

The level of transactions fell by five per cent in 2009, but this came after a 44 per cent decline in 2008, and was followed by a three per cent rise in activity in 2010 - although this can be attributed in part to price adjustments and economic green shoots. 

Who would benefit from a stamp duty holiday?

Stamp duty may be payable (excluding first-time buyer exemptions) on 85 per cent of transactions, but any impact will differ across the country due to the range in house prices.

Zoopla’s calculations show that the “effective” stamp duty rate - the proportion of sale value paid in stamp duty based on actual sales values  -  ranges from less than 0.5 per cent to around  3.5 per cent across the regions. 

In London, the average stamp duty bill for a homeowner is £21,000 - which against average house prices gives an effective rate of 3.4 per cent - one of the highest in the country.

Stamp duty receipts data shows that homebuyers and movers in London and the South East paid 72 per cent of all stamp duty receipts in 2018/19. 

While in London, the South East and the Midlands, under five per cent of sales were  exempt from stamp duty, in parts of the North of England, more than 40 per cent of sales were exempt in the year to April 2019.



Should the Treasury forego revenue to oil the wheels of the housing market?

Yes, as the market does not operate within geographical borders. House prices may differ regionally, but if one part of the market starts to seize up, it has a ripple effect and can impact the wider economy, due to the network effect.

The cost of stamp duty relief - possibly into the billions in lost revenue - is significant. But this is relatively modest when compared to the current cost of government support.

Also, the cost of any stamp duty relief is unlikely to be ‘lost’. Instead, buyers could spend their tax savings on their home, pumping money back into the economy via household retailers.

Any positive effects of a stamp duty holiday are likely to be augmented if they are introduced in tandem with other measures, including access to mortgage lending and a review of Help to Buy. 

These factors combined will allow the much-needed network effect of the housing market to help crank up economic activity in these challenging times.

  • Michael Riley

    I'm surprised that Zoopla would release this. It lacks hard data to prove key points to actually make decisions on and feels like a PR piece to show heads of agencies that "Zoopla is on your side".

    I'm up for lowering frictional costs in moving, but the arguments will need to be far more robust than this.

    PS its not a network effect of spending, its a trickle down effect.

  • icon
    • 28 May 2020 18:26 PM

    The one thing that will assist the economy in general is to get the housing market moving.
    So abolish ALL SDLT for any property up to the value of £500000
    Make this a permanent situation for at least the next 10 years.
    Introduce MIRAS for all purchases up to £500000
    Abolish the PRA requirements preventing IO mortgages.
    No repayment vehicle required for such IO mortgages with terms avail to age 90.
    Abolish S24
    Amend the eviction process to facilitate LL being able to remove rent defaulting tenants 14 days after First rent default with Police assistance if tenants refuse to vacate.
    They do this in Australia very successfully.
    Give VAT holidays for anyone bringing back a vacant property into use.
    Give lenders Govt guarantees so that OO may achieve 95% loans.
    Reduce the maximum LTV for BTL to 50% LTV.
    This will give aspirant OO financial advantage over LL.

    This should mean far more homebuyers able to buy than LL.
    Forcing all new BTL lending for new BTL properties to be no more than 50% LTV will force those properties to be far more financially resilient.

    There are probably a few other things that Govt could do.
    But any easy change is to get the property market moving again.
    I would also allow EA commissions to be offsettable against PAYE tax for the next 10 years.

    All these changes would massively boost the housing market and generate millions in taxes.

  • Matt Faizey

    The most concerning thing for all of us in that article is the snippet pointing out that in under 3decades thee average house value has quadrupled.

    You want to talk volume, or 'helping first timers' or indeed wish to discuss affordability for all ?

    Go back, have a look at that then go look at other countries and see if their bricks'n'mortar inflation has kept up.

    Supply and demand.

    P.s we can't afford a stamp holiday
    We don't need a stamp holiday
    This hasn't been a collapse in demand


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up