By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards


Controversial ‘Slime Balls’ online agency calls in liquidators

A controversial online estate agency has gone into liquidation two years after describing High Street agents as “smug, suited slime-balls.”

BetterMove, registered in Swansea, is described on its website as “Britain’s only pay monthly estate agents”. 

It hit the headlines in 2017 when it described High Street estate agents as “smug, suited slime-balls” in a reference on a property description on Rightmove - the agency at the time put the statement down to an error on the portal’s part.


The pricing offer of the agency has varied over time but most recently it involved a basic package at £74.91p a month, with more elaborate packages charged at £83.25p and £112.08p monthly. 

It claimed 93 per cent customer satisfaction, said it saved sellers an average of over £4,100 per completed transaction, and won a five star rating on AllAgents. The website also carried a series of five star reviews from Trustpilot, although it carried a generic four-star rating from Trustpilot overall.

BetterMove also said it had “a revolutionary online management system, allowing you to be up to date at every step of your journey towards your perfect home.”

When checked by Estate Agent Today yesterday evening BetterMove had fewer than 500 properties listed, mostly at the mid and lower sectors of the market.

The news of liquidation came in an announcement in the London Gazette earlier this week.

BetterMove’s apparent demise is merely the latest in a number of apparent blows to the online agency sector following a Purplebricks profit warning, the collapse of the original Emoov and Tepilo, and the collapse of the original House Network - the agency which has just been purchased by a firm called Universal Acquisitions Ltd.

However, the online sector received strong support at yesterday’s Association of Residential Letting Agents conference from Gillian Kent, the chairperson of online lettings management platform Howsy.

She told ARLA delegates that while online agents had suffered setbacks and “aren’t going to destroy the High Street” they already offer “far better” customer service than traditional agencies. 

She said that many online agents had never charged tenant fees so didn’t need to raise other fees now to compensate for the imminent loss of income.

Kent was then asked by the audience how her firm makes money. She said it was down to “efficiency and not driving around in branded Minis” - a remark which attracted jeers from the audience.

  • Simon Shinerock

    Shame, I thought their name was really ‘Slime Balls’ they obviously didn’t have the balls


    So many names to choose from; I dread having to deal with Choices :-)

  • Paul Singleton

    All that money paid from unsuspecting vendors looking t9 save money with zero result. Becoming typical of failing payanyway clowns.


    “smug, suited slime-balls.” 🤣🤣🤣

  • icon

    Another one bites the dust

  • icon
    • D G
    • 03 April 2019 13:39 PM

    Pay cheap, get cheap, then get nothing


    Is that your company mission statement? 😂😂

  • icon

    Before you get smug about an online agency failure even though they probably deserved it, whose turn is it next? High Street agents aren't having the best of times either?!


Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up