Personal search industry in uproar |
Friday 28th May 2010
The personal search industry has hit back furiously at suggestions reported on EAT this week that official local authority searches should be made compulsory in all house sales.
The proposal came from Jan Boothroyd, chief executive of Land Data, which facilitates the online availability of official local authority searches.
Richard Mathias, of the National Search Service, said the intervention of Land Data chief executive Jan Boothroyd was untimely and unwarranted. Other calls have demanded her resignation.
Mathias said: “Personal searches have been used for over 20 years, and even before HIPs were brought in, 40% of the market used them and were completely happy.
“Lawyers chose to use these searches as opposed to those supplied by a local authority as they provided a cheaper and often faster service. Recent decisions by the Information Commissioner’s office have meant local authorities must now supply search companies with all the data they require free of charge.
“We welcome these changes and we welcome the scrapping of HIPs as they were being used as a rather large stick with which to beat search companies down on price. This inevitably led to quality issues with some less scrupulous search companies providing a poor product.
“Hopefully, law firms will now use the knowledge and experience to work only with the reputable providers, and the ultimate winner will be the consumer who will receive the right search at the right time for the right price.
“Ms Boothroyd also seems to want to ignore OFT advice that the personal search industry provides important competition to local authorities. Perhaps she would prefer we return to the days when search prices in some areas were £200–300 and they would only be turned around in five to six weeks.”
Ronnie Park, chief executive of personal search firm OneSearch Direct, was angry about the intervention by Land Data's chief executive, whilst a personal search trade association, IPSA, also called for Boothroyd to resign.
Park, referring to the announcement of the Decentralisation and Localism Bill in the Queen’s Speech, warned against the wholesale devolution of property searches to local authorities.
Park said: “The private search industry has long provided a reliable and effective service to people buying and selling homes. Consolidating all property searches within local authorities would not only create an unhealthy and potentially illegitimate monopoly, but ultimately undermine the quality of search output.
“The speed, quality and cost of property searches produced by local authorities vary wildly, but the fact is, in most instances they simply take longer to produce poorer results.
“Without the competition in the market from the private sector, efficiency and accuracy in search information would be significantly impeded. With 95% of searches carried out by private search companies, I would suggest that Land Data’s position has now become untenable."
Also up in arms is the Association of Independent Personal Search Agents, which accused Land Data of anti-competitive behaviour.
IPSA chairman Christian Lister said: “ I would also expect Ms Boothroyd to resign for such shameful behaviour, trying to ruin a very fragile housing recovery and consumer confidence.”
| Tweet |
Click here to comment on this story |
(9) Comments | Report Abuse
| | 360 degree feedback is a system provide coaching skills to develop senior managers to lead their teams more effectively and companies re-structured their boards to give more prominence to learning and development and related activities, 360 feedback. |
| | 360 degree feedback is the main highway to grow the business by implementing 360 degree appraisals performance. 360 degree feedback and 360 Degree Employee Evaluations generate the valuable relations within an organizations |
| | Secret Agent, you do make me laugh. I have been in this industry more than ten years and can tell you that the information required in local searches will NEVER be available electronically. With 400 plus Local Authorities who all have their own systems, which they claim are better than everyone else and haven't got an ounce of business nouse, and then plead poverty at the suggestion of investment - which would lead to those same people implementing a new system losing their jobs. Turkeys voting for christmas will never happen in the world of local government. |
| |
I don't care whether it's local authorities or men in vans that provide local search data. I do care that the home buying public are charged for the data that in the vast majority of cases has no bearing at all on whether or not they purchase the property.
Ripped off by the council or ripped off by OneSearch. Whatever. This data should be electronic, openly accessible to all via portal(s) and the various parasitic organizations ripping off our clients to get at it should cease to exist. |
| |
Well well “tired of these arguments” I wonder if you are a local government employee? The fact is that Trading Standards and Property Codes Compliance Board checked out loads of searches both personal and council provided and found more mistakes in the council searches. If you want examples of council mistakes we have hundreds. The Personal Local Search companies who operate to the code of practise give a much better service than the councils and will handle all the inevitable aggravation of providing searches.
Like Pali, most personal search companies offer far more than local authority searches, Drainage and Water, Coal, Environmental, Tin, Lead, Company, Chancel, Conveyance Insurances and many more giving a one stop ordering facility. All the information in the searches and reports is full warranted and insured so why would any one want to buy a council provided search.? |
| | Unfortunately both land data (via NLIS) and the personal search industry do not serve the consumer well. The personal search industry trade on low price but at the cost of quality (for instance a search from a very 'reputable' firm stated a road was un adopted even though it was a 200 year old, city centre highway - even the greenest personal searcher must know this has to be wrong!). NLIS trumpet official information but add cost and an unecessary extra step to the process. Until the whole search industry agrees to a robust and trusted regulator that can act as a kite mark for information and ensure standards the actual consumer will never be well served. |
| | Land Data are not a government agency but they are a Commuinty Interest Company which gives them certain advantages over ordinary companies. The regulations that cover CICs prohibit any attempt to influence government policy and change the law. There are only 2 outcomes possible here - either Jan Boothroyd admits her folly and resigns or Land Data should be stripped of its CIC status. The serious consequences of saying something like this shoud not be brushed under the carpet. Jan Boothroyd has shown her true colours as an ex local government campaigner and friend of the anti-competitive policies rife throughout local authority land information departments. Her position is untenable if Land Data wishes to remain regarded as an independent facilitator and consumer service. |
| | IPSA all the way. Lets keep applying the pressure. Personal Searches have been around for 15/20 years and all the time there is a demand for them we as an industry will supply them...Good work guys keep it up |
DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Estate Agent Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@estateagenttoday.co.uk
| Tweet |
Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@estateagenttoday.co.uk
Milestone of 20 millionth electronic search is reached
Decision time for agents on 'Tesco' conveyancing
Agent launches new HIP-style service









