We have 128 guests online 
Twitter Facebook Linked In Youtube Sign up
Top agents admit to flouting rules on EPCs      Mortgage lending to hit a new low this year, says MAB boss     Asking prices edge up as supply of For Sale stock drops      D-Day dawns for thousands of households at risk of flood      Agents in personal crusades to raise funds for charities    

Anti-HIP petitions to become part of academic research

 

Monday 13th February 2012

Twon anti-Home Information Pack petitions on the Downing Street website are to be part of an academic research project.

The first petition was raised by Nick Salmon of SPLINTA, and called for first-day marketing to be allowed beyond May 31, 2008. It attracted 9,599 signatures.

The second petition was raised by estate agent Trevor Kent in 2008 and attracted 1,684 signatories before closing on January 2, 2009.

It also called for first-day marketing to be allowed to continue without agents having to wait for a HIP first. The Government had announced its intention to make it illegal for agents to market properties without a HIP in place, or face fines of £200 a day.

Both are now to be part of research by Dr Scott Wright, a fellow at the British Academy and a lecturer at Leicester University, who is looking into petitions.

The Government responded at the time to the Trevor Kent petition, saying that its proposed change would “ensure that consumers can see and use the HIP to inform their decisions about a property. These changes will also make it easier for local trading standards agencies to identify specific cases of non-compliance and enforce the HIP duties”.

The official response concluded: “There is no evidence to support the assertion that removal of the temporary first-day marketing concession will have a negative impact on the housing market.” It said that HIPs had no impact on housing transactions or prices.

Trevor Kent commented: “No wonder the Government lost the election.”





Do you have a lettings business to sell?

Share this Article
View Comments                          Click here to comment on this story

(4) Comments | Report Abuse

Added by Hawkeye on 2012-02-14 18:20:32

I'm with you PeeBee. Complete waste of money time and resource.

Anepc - sit on it instead of talking out of it as you are a complete moron in stating HIP's are a good idea. For whom?

Ahip - I could not have put it better myself.
Added by Ahip on 2012-02-13 16:08:55

HIPs had no impact. as worthless as EPCs, just cost more.
Added by anepc on 2012-02-13 13:30:36

HIPS had no impact on whether or not people sold their properties and remain to this day a very good idea.
Added by PeeBee on 2012-02-13 12:30:06

"Both are now to be part of research by Dr Scott Wright, a fellow at the British Academy and a lecturer at Leicester University, who is looking into petitions."

WHY?
Who or what is paying for this "looking into" (as if I didn't need confirmation...)?
At what cost?
For what purpose?

Any other taxpayers have an issue with this? It seems WE are paying for this study...
Post Comments
Please login to post comments.
Email:
Password:
Forgot Password
Post Comments without Login
To prevent spam,please type in result 10 + 4 =
 


DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Estate Agent Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@estateagenttoday.co.uk
Feedback:
If you have any questions or suggestions about this article or our news section, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@estateagenttoday.co.uk
0845 075 0152
Related News Stories
Most Read News Stories


website free tracking
Feedback Form