Estate Agent Today
Today's Headlines:
House prices fall or rise (take your pick)
4 comments
House prices went up slightly – by 0.4% – in July, the Land Registry has reported. It
Knight Frank stay quiet after conman is jailed
9 comments
A tenant who faked his identity when renting through Knight Frank has been jailed for three
Rich overseas buyers keep prime London market aloft
0 comments
Chinese buyers are expected to replace Russian investors as major players in the prime central London
Moving occasion: today's the day!
0 comments
The most popular moving date is today, September 1, the Post Office has revealed. The two next
Prospective first-time buyers sink to new low
0 comments
The proportion of buyers expecting to buy for the first time in the next 12 months
Housing market 'edging towards double dip' claim
2 comments
Net lending plummeted in July to the second lowest monthly figure since records began in 1993,
Henry Pryor Blog
0 comments
Welcome to a new monthly blog by Henry Pryor, estate agent turned entrepreneur, inventor and expert
Rightmove profits climb 39% as more agents sign up
14 comments
A rise in the number of agents and an overall willingness to pay more to Rightmove
Portal creates new 'check out your competition' stats
1 comments
Property portal Home has created some new statistic pages on its site which we reckon will
Six in ten mortgages are now for house purchase
2 comments
The proportion of mortgages being taken out for purchases, as opposed to remortgages, is at its
News Story
Agents told to destroy Office of Fair Trading email
Wednesday 17th February 2010Estate agents who received an email from the OFT showing about 450 addresses of all the recipients have received an apology – and been told to destroy the email or risk breaching the Data Protection Act.
But some angry agents have already complained of receiving messages as a result of the email and told the OFT that its instruction comes too late.
The OFT has also reported itself to the Information Commissioner’s Office, which has responsibility for data protection. The OFT may have to sign an undertaking about how it will send out future communications.
The original email was sent out last Friday to money laundering reporting officers in estate agency firms and businesses which arrange credit.
It was a request for the recipients to take part in a consultation on money laundering.
But, in an extraordinary blunder, the email showed every single recipient’s contact information in the address line – potentially exposing to crooks those with the sensitive job of reporting money laundering suspicions.
The mistake could not have come at a worse time, with estate agents already up in arms over having to register for anti-money laundering purposes with the OFT in order to avoid trading illegally.
Yesterday, the director of anti-money laundering at the OFT, John Parker, wrote to those who had received last Friday’s email.
“I am writing to apologise for the fact that the OFT may have inadvertently disclosed to you and others information it should not have done.
“In your role as a Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) for a business supervised by the OFT you were sent an email on Friday 12 February entitled ‘Information for Money Laundering Nominated Officer’ advising of the launch of the OFT’s consultation on its future supervisory role. Our aim was to encourage those supervised by the OFT to participate in the consultation and shape our future regime.
“I regret that an error in sending the message has resulted in you and others receiving details of MLRO email addresses in the ‘To’ field of the email.
“The OFT takes its responsibility under the Data Protection Act very seriously, and we have therefore contacted the Information Commissioner’s Office which has responsibility for overseeing implementation of the Data Protection Act.
“In the meantime the list of e-mail addresses that you received may constitute personal data of those named and should not be disclosed further. As you may know, processing (which includes use and disclosure of) personal data for a purpose which is incompatible with the purpose for which it was obtained is a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. I therefore now have to ask you to delete the email from the OFT of 12 February and to destroy any copies (in whatever form) made.
“You will understand the necessity of this to ensure that any further disclosure or processing of this information is prevented. I am sorry to have to write to you in these rather formal terms.
“Please also accept my sincere apology for the disclosure of your email address to other businesses. I understand that this may have caused you distress or inconvenience and recognise that the error made was unacceptable. I will take the necessary steps to ensure that this is not repeated.”
Send to a Friend Today's other headlinesView Comments 10 comments
Report AbuseGet Profile | GET OVER IT! Jeeez. He is sorry for the "distress" that this has so cearly caused. |
Get Profile | Did you notice in the very first line of Mr Parker's grudging appology (and subsequent threat)that he's still in mistake-denial by saying "the OFT 'MAY' have inadvertantly disclosed information etc etc". No Mr Parker, there's no 'may' about it, you HAVE, and I for one am suffering with spam from it already. Perhaps he might do us the favour of answering Secret Agent's question about VAT and receipts on the recent £200 money he's laundered from us. At least the sun's shining and there's a stiff breeze so if anyone in authority hangs him out on a line -he'll soon dry. All the best folks, Big T |
Get Profile | Thanks a bunch Mr Parker. If you open a bit wider you might get the other foot in as well!
Incidentally, does anyone know if the Registration Fee included VAT or not? I have not recieved any kind of invoice or VAT receipt and my local Trading Standards Officer couldn't tell me either. PRICELESS!!! |
Get Profile | as long as you have apologised all is forgiven.... I hope that if I ever have a run in with the OFT you will accept my apology.... |
Get Profile | Mr. Parker has written a long 'screed' apologising (also containing a warning about breaching the DPA)saying the OFT takes its responsibilities very seriously.
So that's alright then! |
Get Profile | thats what i call a school boy error |
Get Profile | I went to shut that stable door and the horse had bolted!! |
Get Profile | To top that off I received an email informing me of our registration number, just a shame it was for a Bus Company!!! |
Post Comments
Please login to post comments:Post Comments without login
DISCLAIMER: The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Estate Agent Today (nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news. Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments, due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly. Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@estateagenttoday.co.uk
Related News Stories:
House prices fall or rise (take your pick)Wednesday 1st September 2010
Knight Frank stay quiet after conman is jailed
Wednesday 1st September 2010
Rich overseas buyers keep prime London market aloft
Wednesday 1st September 2010
Moving occasion: today's the day!
Wednesday 1st September 2010
Prospective first-time buyers sink to new low
Wednesday 1st September 2010
Most Read News Stories:
Three quarters of agents threaten to quit RightmoveFriday 10th October 2008
EPCs on all properties for sale: VERY LATEST UPDATE
Monday 8th September 2008
HIPs abolition order is signed and ready
Monday 17th May 2010
NEWS FLASH – HIPs suspended
Thursday 20th May 2010
NEWS FLASH:HIPs face certain death
Wednesday 12th May 2010
Print
Share this article:
Digg it
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Newsvine
Nowpublic
Facebook
Feedback:
If you have any questions or suggestions about this article or our news section, please don't hesitate to contact us.Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw | rosalind.renshaw@estateagenttoday.co.uk | 01252 843 566.









Get Profile